IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/presci/v97y2018i4p1169-1202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The performance of non‐survey techniques for constructing sub‐territorial input‐output tables

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe Ricciardo Lamonica
  • Francesco Maria Chelli

Abstract

This study is a contribution to the ongoing debate on the performance of various non‐survey techniques for constructing sub‐territorial input‐output tables. Three aspects of the behaviour of the methods are analysed: performances in reproducing ‘true’ input coefficients, variability of error, and direction of bias. The analysis uses real data and in particular the world input‐output table. The most important aspect that emerges from the analysis is that even though simple location quotient (SLQ) has been identified as one of the most robust methods, its performance drops when confronted with Input Output Tables characterized by a high percentage of technical coefficients close to zero. Also the cross industry location quotient (CILQ), the semi logarithmic location quotient (RLQ), the symmetric cross industry location quotient (SCILQ) methods behave in a similar way. On the contrary, the performance of the methods the Flegg location quotient (FLQ) for δ = 0.2 and the Augmented Flegg location quotient (AFLQ) for 0.2 ≤ δ ≤ 0.3 are not affected by this situation. Este estudio es una contribución al debate en curso sobre el desempeño de varias técnicas no basadas en encuestas para construir tablas input‐output sub‐territoriales. Se analizan tres aspectos del comportamiento de los métodos: los desempeños en la reproducción de coeficientes input ‘verdaderos’, la variabilidad del error y la dirección del sesgo. El análisis utiliza datos reales y, en particular, la tabla mundial de input‐output. El aspecto más importante que surge del análisis es que aunque el cociente de localización simple (SLQ, por sus siglas en inglés) se ha identificado como uno de los métodos más robustos, su desempeño disminuye cuando es comparado con las tablas input‐output, caracterizadas por un alto porcentaje de coeficientes técnicos cercanos a cero. El cociente de localización entre sectores (CILQ), el cociente de localización semilogarítmico (RLQ) y los métodos de cociente de localización simétrico entre sectores (SCILQ) se comportan también de manera similar (todas las siglas procedentes del inglés). Por el contrario, el desempeño de los métodos del cociente de localización de Flegg (FLQ) para δ = 0,2 y el cociente de localización de Flegg aumentado (AFLQ) para 0,2 ≤ δ ≤ 0,3 no se ve afectado por esta situación (todas las siglas procedentes del inglés). 本稿は、地域以下のレベルの産業連関表を作成するための様々なノンサーベイ法のパフォーマンスに関する現在の議論に資するものである。ノンサーベイ法の性質の3つの側面、すなわち正しい投入係数を算出する精度、エラーの変動、バイアスの方向を分析する。分析では実際のデータ、具体的には世界の産業連関表を使用する。分析から最も重要な側面として現れたのは、SLQ(simple location quotient)法は、最も頑健な方法であることが確認されているが、特徴としてゼロに近い係数の割合が高い産業連関表に対しては精度が大きく低下するということである。CILQ(cross industry location quotient)法、RLQ(semi logarithmic location quotient)法、SCILQ(symmetric cross industry location quotient)法も同じ性質をもつ。一方、δ = 0.2のFLQ(Flegg location quotient)法と0.2 ≤ δ ≤ 0.3のAFLQ(Augmented Flegg location quotient)法はこの状態の影響を受けない。

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Ricciardo Lamonica & Francesco Maria Chelli, 2018. "The performance of non‐survey techniques for constructing sub‐territorial input‐output tables," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(4), pages 1169-1202, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:presci:v:97:y:2018:i:4:p:1169-1202
    DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12297
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/pirs.12297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gianluca Egidi & Luca Salvati & Andrea Falcone & Giovanni Quaranta & Rosanna Salvia & Renata Vcelakova & Antonio Giménez-Morera, 2021. "Re-Framing the Latent Nexus between Land-Use Change, Urbanization and Demographic Transitions in Advanced Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Francesca Bartolacci & Rosanna Salvia & Giovanni Quaranta & Luca Salvati, 2022. "Seeking the Optimal Dimension of Local Administrative Units: A Reflection on Urban Concentration and Changes in Municipal Size," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir & Andrea Colantoni & Enrico Maria Mosconi & Stefano Poponi & Simona Fortunati & Luca Salvati & Filippo Gambella, 2020. "From Historical Narratives to Circular Economy: De-Complexifying the “Desertification” Debate," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Clio Ciaschini & Margherita Carlucci & Francesco Maria Chelli & Giuseppe Ricciardo Lamonica, 2021. "The Marche region and its industry pattern: a quantitative evaluation," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 75(1), pages 89-100, January-M.
    5. Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir & Gianluca Egidi & Rosanna Salvia & Luca Salvati & Adele Sateriano & Antonio Gimenez-Morera, 2021. "Recession, Local Fertility, and Urban Sustainability: Results of a Quasi-Experiment in Greece, 1991–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Kostas Rontos & Andrea Colantoni & Luca Salvati & Enrico Maria Mosconi & Antonio Giménez Morera, 2020. "Resident or Present? Population Census Data Tell You More about Suburbanization," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, October.
    7. Daniela Smiraglia & Luca Salvati & Gianluca Egidi & Rosanna Salvia & Antonio Giménez-Morera & Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir, 2021. "Toward a New Urban Cycle? A Closer Look to Sprawl, Demographic Transitions and the Environment in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Rosanna Salvia & Gianluca Egidi & Luca Salvati & Jesús Rodrigo-Comino & Giovanni Quaranta, 2020. "In-Between ‘Smart’ Urban Growth and ‘Sluggish’ Rural Development? Reframing Population Dynamics in Greece, 1940–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Margherita Carlucci & Sabato Vinci & Giuseppe Ricciardo Lamonica & Luca Salvati, 2022. "Socio-spatial Disparities and the Crisis: Swimming Pools as a Proxy of Class Segregation in Athens," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 937-961, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:presci:v:97:y:2018:i:4:p:1169-1202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1056-8190 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.