IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/presci/v75y1996i2p103-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Choice Of An Input‐Output Table Embedded In Regional Econometric Input‐Output Models

Author

Listed:
  • Philip R. Israilevich
  • Geoffrey J.D. Hewings
  • Graham R. Schindler
  • Ramamohan Mahidhara

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, we investigate the role of input‐output data sources in regional econometric input‐output models. While there has been a great deal of experimentation focused on the accuracy of alternative methods for estimating regional input‐output coefficients, little attention has been directed to the role of accuracy when the input‐output system is nested within a broader accounting framework. The issues of accuracy were considered in two contexts, forecasting and impact analysis focusing on a model developed for the Chicago region. We experimented with three input‐output data sources: observed regional data, national input‐output, and randomly generated input‐output coefficients. The effects of different sources of input‐output data on regional econometric input‐output models revealed that there are significant differences in results obtained in both forecast and impact analyses. The adjustment processes inherent in the econometric input‐output system did not mask the differences imbedded in input‐output tables derived from different data sources. Since applications of these types of models involve both impact and forecasting exercises, there should be strong motivation for basing the system on the most accurate set of input‐output accounts.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip R. Israilevich & Geoffrey J.D. Hewings & Graham R. Schindler & Ramamohan Mahidhara, 1996. "The Choice Of An Input‐Output Table Embedded In Regional Econometric Input‐Output Models," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 103-119, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:presci:v:75:y:1996:i:2:p:103-119
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5597.1996.tb00656.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1996.tb00656.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1996.tb00656.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Takuro Uehara & Mateo Cordier & Bertrand Hamaide, 2018. "Fully dynamic input-output/system dynamics modeling for ecological-economic system analysis," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/277116, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Takuro Uehara & Mateo Cordier & Bertrand Hamaide, 2018. "Fully Dynamic Input-Output/System Dynamics Modeling for Ecological-Economic System Analysis," Post-Print hal-02862512, HAL.
    3. Xu, Yue & Tian, Shu & Wang, Qingsong & Yuan, Xueliang & Ma, Qiao & Liu, Mengyue & Xu, Zhaopeng & Liu, Jixiang & Xu, Xiang & Liu, Chengqing, 2021. "Optimization path of energy-economy system from the perspective of minimum industrial structure adjustment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    4. Sergio J. Rey, 1998. "The Performance of Alternative Integration Strategies for Combining Regional Econometric and Input-Output Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 21(1), pages 1-35, April.
    5. Francesc Sastre & Javier Rey-Maquieira & Italo Arbulú, 2017. "The euro crisis, fiscal devaluation, and impacts on the tourism sector in the Spanish economy," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(4), pages 816-833, June.
    6. James C. Davis & Brian P. Holly, 2006. "Regional Analysis Using Census Bureau Microdata at the Center for Economic Studies," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 29(3), pages 278-296, July.
    7. Gabela, Julio Gustavo Fournier, 2020. "On the accuracy of gravity-RAS approaches used for inter-regional trade estimation: evidence using the 2005 inter-regional input–output table of Japan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 521-539.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:presci:v:75:y:1996:i:2:p:103-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1056-8190 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.