IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ppolre/v15y2008i3p133-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is gender equality legislation becoming counter‐productive?

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Hakim

Abstract

Catherine Hakim argues that social and family policy must now be gender‐neutral, but should cater for diversity in lifestyle preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Hakim, 2008. "Is gender equality legislation becoming counter‐productive?," Public Policy Review, Institute for Public Policy Research, vol. 15(3), pages 133-136, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ppolre:v:15:y:2008:i:3:p:133-136
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-540X.2008.00528.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-540X.2008.00528.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1744-540X.2008.00528.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Schröder, 2020. "Men Lose Life Satisfaction with Fewer Hours in Employment: Mothers Do Not Profit from Longer Employment—Evidence from Eight Panels," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 317-334, November.
    2. Marit Rønsen & Ragni Hege Kitterød, 2015. "Gender-Equalizing Family Policies and Mothers' Entry into Paid Work: Recent Evidence From Norway," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 59-89, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ppolre:v:15:y:2008:i:3:p:133-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipprruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.