IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v28y2019i6p1486-1502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scrap or Sell: The Decision on Production Yield Loss

Author

Listed:
  • Rong Li
  • Yu Xia
  • Xiaohang Yue

Abstract

Many production processes not only produce desired quality products (high‐end products), but also generate yield loss or Not‐Quite‐Perfect Products (NQPPs) that do not fully meet the quality standards. In practice, a manufacturer may choose to (1) scrap all NQPPs at a cost and carry the high‐end products only, or (2) sell some or all NQPPs to a value‐conscious low‐end market and carry both high‐end products and low‐end products (NQPPs). This research studies the optimal decision on production yield loss (scrap or sell) and the corresponding pricing and operational strategies under different practical situations. Building upon a standard marketing model for two separated markets, that is, the high‐end and the low‐end markets, we model the manufacturer’s profit maximization problem as a nonlinear programming problem. We characterize the optimal yield–loss decision and the corresponding optimal pricing for each market and production quantity. We also consider the situation that the NQPPs may face competition in the low‐end market with products designed and produced specifically for that market. In contrast to the common belief that selling NQPPs to a low‐end market can recover some of the cost and hence lead to a higher profit, we show that when the yield rate is small or large enough, selling NQPPs may hurt the manufacturer due to the loss of full control over both markets. This is especially true when competition exists in the low‐end market. This research provides practitioners with detailed guidelines on when and how a specific yield loss (product line or marketing) strategy should be adopted. Managerial insights are generated for the optimal yield loss strategies; numerical tests further demonstrate our results.

Suggested Citation

  • Rong Li & Yu Xia & Xiaohang Yue, 2019. "Scrap or Sell: The Decision on Production Yield Loss," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(6), pages 1486-1502, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:28:y:2019:i:6:p:1486-1502
    DOI: 10.1111/poms.13000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13000
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/poms.13000?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Xiangxiang & Zha, Yong & Yu, Yugang, 2022. "The developer’s sourcing strategy in the presence of a competing manufacturer and consumers’ two-dimensional differentiated preferences," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Hezarkhani, Behzad & Demirel, Guven & Bouchery, Yann & Dora, Manoj, 2023. "Can “ugly veg” supply chains reduce food loss?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 117-132.
    3. Zhou, Pin & Xu, He & Chen, Jiguang, 2020. "Value of down-conversion policy in a vertical differentiated co-production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:28:y:2019:i:6:p:1486-1502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.