IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v28y2019i2p341-353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

(Rescaled) Multi‐Attempt Approximation of Choice Model and Its Application to Assortment Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Hakjin Chung
  • Hyun‐Soo Ahn
  • Stefanus Jasin

Abstract

When designing an assortment, a fundamental trade‐off exists between estimating consumer behavior more precisely and solving the corresponding optimization problem efficiently. For instance, a mixture of logit model can closely approximate any random‐utility choice model; however, it is not suitable for optimization when the number of customer segments and the number of products considered are large. As many companies are using big data and marketing analytics toward microsegmenting consumers, a choice model that is amenable in the problem size becomes necessary for assortment design. In this work, we provide a new approach to approximate any random‐utility choice model by characterizing the estimation errors in a classical exogenous demand model and significantly improving its performance with a rescaling method. We show that the resulting approximation is exact for Multinomial Logit (MNL). If, however, the underlying true choice model is not MNL, we show numerically that the approximation under our so‐called rescaled two‐attempt model outperforms the widely used MNL approximation, and provides performance close to the Markov chain approximation (in some cases, it performs better than the Markov chain approximation). Our proposed approximation can be used to solve a general assortment optimization problem with a variety of (linear) real‐world constraints. In contrast to the more direct Mixed Integer Optimization (MIO) approach that utilizes Latent Class Multinomial Logit (LC‐MNL), whose running time increases exponentially in the number of mixtures, our approximation yields an alternative MIO formulation whose empirical running time is independent of the number of mixtures.

Suggested Citation

  • Hakjin Chung & Hyun‐Soo Ahn & Stefanus Jasin, 2019. "(Rescaled) Multi‐Attempt Approximation of Choice Model and Its Application to Assortment Optimization," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(2), pages 341-353, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:28:y:2019:i:2:p:341-353
    DOI: 10.1111/poms.12916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12916
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/poms.12916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xi Chen & Chao Shi & Yining Wang & Yuan Zhou, 2021. "Dynamic Assortment Planning Under Nested Logit Models," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(1), pages 85-102, January.
    2. Qi Feng & J. George Shanthikumar & Mengying Xue, 2022. "Consumer Choice Models and Estimation: A Review and Extension," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 847-867, February.
    3. Çömez-Dolgan, Nagihan & Fescioglu-Unver, Nilgun & Cephe, Ecem & Şen, Alper, 2021. "Capacitated strategic assortment planning under explicit demand substitution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 1120-1138.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:28:y:2019:i:2:p:341-353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.