IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v57y2009i4p788-804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Arguments for Naturalisation

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Seglow

Abstract

This article investigates what moral principles should inform states' decisions to grant resident migrants the rights of full citizenship. Some work on this question has focused on the beliefs and attitudes it is thought desirable for migrants to have. This article takes a different approach. Beginning from the assumption that a high rate of naturalisation is desirable, the article investigates four arguments in its favour. The contribution argument says that residents merit citizenship by virtue of their productive contribution to their new society. The coercion argument says it is wrong to impose on resident migrants laws they had no say in making. The membership argument says that migrants merit citizenship because they are already members of society. The respect argument says that long‐term alienage is a failure of respect. I argue that the respect account escapes the difficulties of the other arguments, and best matches our intuitions about naturalisation. Further, the respect which states and citizens owe migrants, if manifest in the right political climate, is likely to lead to migrants respecting their new society too, and hence having the right kinds of attitude towards it.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Seglow, 2009. "Arguments for Naturalisation," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(4), pages 788-804, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:57:y:2009:i:4:p:788-804
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00768.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00768.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00768.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Seglow, 2005. "The Ethics of Immigration," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 3(3), pages 317-334, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patti Tamara Lenard & Christine Straehle, 2012. "Temporary labour migration, global redistribution, and democratic justice," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 11(2), pages 206-230, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fischer Yannick, 2020. "Basic Income, Labour Automation and Migration – An Approach from a Republican Perspective," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 1-034, December.
    2. Zinovijus Ciupijus, 2010. "Ethical Pitfalls of Temporary Labour Migration: A Critical Review of Issues," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 9-18, December.
    3. Trevor Jones & Monder Ram & Maria Villares-Varela, 2019. "Diversity, economic development and new migrant entrepreneurs," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(5), pages 960-976, April.
    4. Dilshad SABRI ALI, 2019. "How Does Mass Immigration Transform The Destination Societies?," Prizren Social Science Journal, SHIKS, vol. 3(3), pages 77-83, December.
    5. Hock Thye Chan, 2018. "What is the Problem Represented to Be: A Research Methodology forAnalysing Australias Skilled Migration Policy," International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs (IJBEA), Sana N. Maswadeh, vol. 3(1), pages 21-32.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:57:y:2009:i:4:p:788-804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.