IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v56y2008i4p957-963.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Territory is Not Derived from Property: A Response to Steiner

Author

Listed:
  • Cara Nine

Abstract

An individualistic Lockean theory of territory holds that territorial rights are coextensive with and arise from the private property rights of individuals. In this essay I extend and deepen my arguments against this view. This essay is a rejoinder to Hillel Steiner's critique of my earlier arguments against the individualistic Lockean theory of territory.

Suggested Citation

  • Cara Nine, 2008. "Territory is Not Derived from Property: A Response to Steiner," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(4), pages 957-963, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:56:y:2008:i:4:p:957-963
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00765.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00765.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00765.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cara Nine, 2008. "A Lockean Theory of Territory," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56, pages 148-165, March.
    2. Hillel Steiner, 2008. "May Lockean Doughnuts Have Holes? The Geometry of Territorial Jurisdiction: A Response to Nine," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56, pages 949-956, December.
    3. Hillel Steiner, 2008. "May Lockean Doughnuts Have Holes? The Geometry of Territorial Jurisdiction: A Response to Nine," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(4), pages 949-956, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:sae:envval:v:26:y:2017:i:1:p:53-72 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cara Nine, 2019. "Do territorial rights include the right to exclude?," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 18(4), pages 307-322, November.
    2. Fabian Wendt, 2015. "Justice and political authority in left-libertarianism," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 14(3), pages 316-339, August.
    3. Hillel Steiner, 2008. "May Lockean Doughnuts Have Holes? The Geometry of Territorial Jurisdiction: A Response to Nine," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(4), pages 949-956, December.
    4. Ben Saunders, 2012. "Defining the demos," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 11(3), pages 280-301, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:56:y:2008:i:4:p:957-963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.