IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v29y1981i3p339-351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Social Contract In Leviathan And The Prisoner'S Dilemma Supergame

Author

Listed:
  • IAIN McLEAN

Abstract

type="main" xml:lang="en"> Abstract. The familiar problem of whether Hobbesian men in the state of nature would ever abide by an agreement to obey a Sovereign is a version of the puzzle now known as‘Prisoner's Dilemma'. The present paper has the following aims: (1) To establish that the game-theory approach is a legitimate way to study Hobbes. (2) To see whether a proposed 'solution’to the paradox of Prisoner's Dilemma applies to this example. The paradox is that individually rational self-interested calculations sum to an outcome that is suboptimal not only for society but also for every single member of it. The solution is the Supergame which consists of indefinitely repeated plays of the simple Prisoner's Dilemma game. (3) To compare the results of the above with the similar conclusions reached by a different route by recent arguments in sociobiology.

Suggested Citation

  • IAIN McLEAN, 1981. "The Social Contract In Leviathan And The Prisoner'S Dilemma Supergame," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 29(3), pages 339-351, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:29:y:1981:i:3:p:339-351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1981.tb00500.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Müller Christian, 1999. "Brauchen wir einen Schleier der Unkenntnis?," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 50(1), pages 207-232, January.
    2. Hugh Ward, 1990. "Three Men in a Boat, Two Must Row," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(3), pages 371-400, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:29:y:1981:i:3:p:339-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.