IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/pbudge/v45y2025i1p21-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

United States Federal Indebtedness and Fiscal Policy Trade‐Offs

Author

Listed:
  • Jagadeesh Gokhale
  • Kent Smetters

Abstract

Projected federal spending and taxes are distributed by birth year, gender, race, and lifetime education, using the Congressional Budget Office's 10‐year budget estimates and the Penn Wharton Budget Models' microsimulation. This enables measurement of conventional federal fiscal imbalance (FI): $162.6 trillion in present value, which is six‐fold larger than current debt held by the public. FI implies a shortfall of 26.1% in federal taxes, alternatively, an excess of 33.4% of federal expenditures. The equi‐proportional shortfall of expenditures plus taxes equals 14.6%. Excluding taxes and transfers of some groups, such as the elderly, increases the measured shortfall.

Suggested Citation

  • Jagadeesh Gokhale & Kent Smetters, 2025. "United States Federal Indebtedness and Fiscal Policy Trade‐Offs," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 21-56, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:pbudge:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:21-56
    DOI: 10.1111/pbaf.12376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12376
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/pbaf.12376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:pbudge:v:45:y:2025:i:1:p:21-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0275-1100 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.