IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/pbudge/v39y2019i2p68-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of the Amazon Tax on Local Sales Tax Revenue in Urban and Rural Jurisdictions

Author

Listed:
  • Whitney B. Afonso

Abstract

E‐commerce has become an integral part of Americans’ lives and while it offers many benefits, it also represents forgone sales tax revenue for governments. Using a difference‐in‐differences model, this analysis examines how the Amazon tax affected local sales tax collections in North Carolina and whether that impact has been greater for urban, rural, or tourism‐rich counties. The results suggest that the Amazon tax increased revenues and urban jurisdictions benefit most. This finding is important for practitioners and policymakers as they consider the impact of policy changes, such as the South Dakota v. Wayfair ruling, on revenue capacity and financial management.

Suggested Citation

  • Whitney B. Afonso, 2019. "The Impact of the Amazon Tax on Local Sales Tax Revenue in Urban and Rural Jurisdictions," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 68-90, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:pbudge:v:39:y:2019:i:2:p:68-90
    DOI: 10.1111/pbaf.12215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12215
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/pbaf.12215?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agrawal, David R. & Shybalkina, Iuliia, 2023. "Online shopping can redistribute local tax revenue from urban to rural America," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    2. Bauer, Anahid & Fernández Guerrico, Sofía, 2023. "Effects of E-commerce on Local Labor Markets," IZA Discussion Papers 16345, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:pbudge:v:39:y:2019:i:2:p:68-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0275-1100 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.