IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/metroe/v69y2018i1p2-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can monetary policy survive policy model mis†specification? Model uncertainty and the perils of “policy model complacencyâ€

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Setterfield

Abstract

The question addressed in this paper is: can monetary policy succeed in stabilizing the economy even when the policy model on which it is predicated is mis†specified? Using variants of the 3†equation macroeconomic model, it is shown that this question can be answered in the affirmative. The purpose of the paper is not to encourage indifference toward model uncertainty, however, but rather to warn against the perils of “policy model complacency.†This arises if the success of policy is misinterpreted as successful understanding of the workings of the economy, which makes the policy maker vulnerable to surprises: events with systematic origins in the “true†model of the economy that are not anticipated by the (mis†specified) policy model. To safeguard against this problem, policy makers should always entertain eclectic views of the workings of the economy. This task is easily accomplished by paying attention to heterodox macroeconomics, which frequently makes predictions that are very much at variance with those of the dominant policy model.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Setterfield, 2018. "Can monetary policy survive policy model mis†specification? Model uncertainty and the perils of “policy model complacencyâ€," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(1), pages 2-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:metroe:v:69:y:2018:i:1:p:2-15
    DOI: 10.1111/meca.12163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12163
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/meca.12163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:metroe:v:69:y:2018:i:1:p:2-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0026-1386 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.