IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/manchs/v87y2019i1p117-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entry under an Information‐Gathering Monopoly

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Barrachina

Abstract

The effects of information‐gathering activities on an entry model with asymmetric information are analysed. The baseline game is a classical entry game where an incumbent monopoly faces potential entry by a firm without knowing for certain whether this potential entrant is weak or strong. If the entrant decides to enter, the incumbent must compete with him and decide whether to accommodate or to fight. The paper extends this entry game and considers that the monopoly credibly informs the entrant that she is able to gather information about his type if he finally enters the market, thereby helping her to better decide whether to accommodate or fight. Since knowing this might reduce the entrant’s willingness to compete with her, we focus the analysis on the effectiveness of this monopoly’s communicative action as an entry deterrence strategy. The results suggest that such an action is effective regardless of the precision of the Intelligence System (IS) only for a relatively low payoff gained by the entrant from competing with the incumbent. For higher payoffs for the entrant, the effectiveness of this action requires a considerably accurate IS.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Barrachina, 2019. "Entry under an Information‐Gathering Monopoly," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 87(1), pages 117-134, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:87:y:2019:i:1:p:117-134
    DOI: 10.1111/manc.12229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12229
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/manc.12229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barrachina, Alex & Forner-Carreras, Teresa, 2022. "Market must be defended: The role of counter-espionage policy in protecting domestic market welfare," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    2. Jing Li & Yulin Zhang, 2021. "More market awareness, more profit? Competitive environments, business expansions, and two‐sided markets," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(2), pages 249-267, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:87:y:2019:i:1:p:117-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/semanuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.