IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/manchs/v68y2000i3p360-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Post Deregulation Analysis of the Sources of Productivity Growth in UK Building Societies

Author

Listed:
  • J. Colin Glass
  • Donal G. McKillop

Abstract

In this study we employ a distance function approach to investigate sources of productivity growth in UK building societies in the post‐deregulation period 1989–93. Productivity growth is decomposed into technical change and change in efficiency, with the latter change also being decomposed into change in pure technical efficiency, change in scale efficiency and change in input congestion. As a scale‐inefficient society may be able to obtain size efficiency gains even when the attainment of scale efficiency is impractical, we also measure the change in size efficiency over the period. The finding of substantial productivity growth was largely due to progressive shifts in technology, with the relatively small improvements in efficiency being largely due to improvements in scale efficiency. A marked increase in the attainment of size efficiency over the period was also found.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Colin Glass & Donal G. McKillop, 2000. "A Post Deregulation Analysis of the Sources of Productivity Growth in UK Building Societies," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 68(3), pages 360-385, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:68:y:2000:i:3:p:360-385
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9957.00199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9957.00199
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9957.00199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Epure, Mircea & Kerstens, Kristiaan & Prior, Diego, 2011. "Technology-based total factor productivity and benchmarking: New proposals and an application," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 608-619, December.
    2. Arnaud Abad & Rabaozafy Louisa Andriamasy & Walter Briec, 2018. "Surplus measures and luenberger Hicks–Moorsteen productivity indicator," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 125(3), pages 279-308, November.
    3. W. Briec & K. Kerstens, 2009. "Infeasibility and Directional Distance Functions with Application to the Determinateness of the Luenberger Productivity Indicator," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 55-73, April.
    4. Mad Ithnin Salleh & Shariffah Nur Illiana Syed Ismail & Nurul Fadly Habidin & Nor Azrin Md Latip, 2016. "Efficiency and Productivity Changes of the Malaysian Community Colleges," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(12), pages 407-424, December.
    5. Walter Briec & Kristiaan Kerstens, 2011. "The Hicks–Moorsteen Productivity Index Satisfies The Determinateness Axiom," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 79(4), pages 765-775, July.
    6. Amir Arjomandi & Mad Ithnin Salleh & Abbas Mohammadzadeh, 2015. "Measuring productivity change in higher education: an application of Hicks–Moorsteen total factor productivity index to Malaysian public universities," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 630-643, October.
    7. Andrew C. Worthington, 2010. "Frontier Efficiency Measurement In Deposit‐Taking Financial Mutuals: A Review Of Techniques, Applications, And Future Research Directions," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 81(1), pages 39-75, March.
    8. John K. Ashton & Stephen Letza, 2003. "The Differential Returns Offered by Mutually Owned and Proprietary UK Depository Institutions: 1993–2000," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 183-204, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:manchs:v:68:y:2000:i:3:p:360-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/semanuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.