IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/manch2/v65y1997i4p443-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profit-Rate Equalization in the Kalecki-Steindl Model and the "Over-Determination" Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Dutt, Amitava Krishna

Abstract

This note points out that the 'overdetermination' problem discovered by M.-S. Park in Kalecki-Steindl (KS) models is not a problem intrinsic to KS models and can easily be removed if one introduces a mechanism involving classical competition into them. The solution to the problem suggested by Park using a moving average interpretation is, therefore, unnecessary and it also does not provide an adequate solution to the overdetermination problem. However, the interpretation does serve to clarify the meaning of long-run equilibria in KS models. Copyright 1997 by Blackwell Publishers Ltd and The Victoria University of Manchester

Suggested Citation

  • Dutt, Amitava Krishna, 1997. "Profit-Rate Equalization in the Kalecki-Steindl Model and the "Over-Determination" Problem," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 65(4), pages 443-451, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:manch2:v:65:y:1997:i:4:p:443-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucrezia Fanti & Luca Zamparelli, 2021. "The paradox of thrift in a two‐sector Kaleckian growth model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 526-538, July.
    2. Domenica Tropeano, 2012. "Income Distribution, Growth and Financialization: The Italian Case," Chapters, in: Claude Gnos & Louis-Philippe Rochon & Domenica Tropeano (ed.), Employment, Growth and Development, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Ohno, Takashi, 2014. "The role of the Taylor principle in the neo-Kaleckian model when applied to an endogenous market structure," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 32-42.
    4. Brenck, Clara & Carvalho, Laura, 2020. "The equalizing spiral in early 21st century Brazil: a Kaleckian model with sectoral heterogeneity," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 298-310.
    5. Huang, Biao, 2022. "On the Over-determination Problem in a Two Sector Neo-Kaleckian Model," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP56, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa".
    6. Nishi, Hiroshi, 2020. "A two-sector Kaleckian model of growth and distribution with endogenous productivity dynamics," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 223-243.
    7. Beqiraj, Elton & Fanti, Lucrezia & Zamparelli, Luca, 2018. "Structural Change and the Wage Share: a Two-Sector Kaleckian Model," MPRA Paper 89558, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Mariolis, Theodore, 2007. "Distribution and Growth in an Economy with Heterogeneous Capital and Excess Capacity," MPRA Paper 24042, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Takashi Ohno, 2009. "Post‐Keynesian Effective Demand And Capital–Labour Substitution," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 525-536, July.
    10. Beqiraj, Elton & Fanti, Lucrezia & Zamparelli, Luca, 2019. "Sectoral composition of output and the wage share: The role of the service sector," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-10.
    11. Marc Lavoie, 2016. "Convergence Towards the Normal Rate of Capacity Utilization in Neo-Kaleckian Models: The Role of Non-Capacity Creating Autonomous Expenditures," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(1), pages 172-201, February.
    12. Ricardo Azevedo Araujo & Carlos Eduardo Drumond, 2021. "A two‐sector neo‐Kaleckian model of growth and distribution: Investment allocation and evolutionary dynamics," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 213-236, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:manch2:v:65:y:1997:i:4:p:443-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/semanuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.