IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/manch2/v60y1992i4p403-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should Buffer Stock Theorists Be Broad- or Narrow-Minded? Some Answers from Aggregate U.K. Data: 1966-1989

Author

Listed:
  • Mizen, Paul

Abstract

A long-run solution for U.K aggregate M1 and M4 is found using the Engle-Granger (1987) and Johansen (1988) cointegration techniques and this is incorporated into a vector autoregressive model of the Forward-Looking Rational Expectations Buffer Stock Model of Cuthbertson and Taylor (1987). The validity of the model is tested by a non-linear Wald test and the stability of the model is examined for each aggregate, using variance ratio analysis. Under these stability tests, the broader definition of money, M4, was found to be a more appropriate buffer aggregate than M1, supporting the theoretical postulate proposed by Bain and McGregor (1985), Cuthbertson and Taylor (1987), and Muscatelli (1988, 1989, 1990). Copyright 1992 by Blackwell Publishers Ltd and The Victoria University of Manchester

Suggested Citation

  • Mizen, Paul, 1992. "Should Buffer Stock Theorists Be Broad- or Narrow-Minded? Some Answers from Aggregate U.K. Data: 1966-1989," The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, University of Manchester, vol. 60(4), pages 403-418, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:manch2:v:60:y:1992:i:4:p:403-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mizen, Paul, 1996. "Modeling the demand for money in the industrial and commercial companies sector in the United Kingdom," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 445-467, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:manch2:v:60:y:1992:i:4:p:403-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/semanuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.