IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/kyklos/v78y2025i2p493-509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beliefs of Peers' Behavior, Clinical Guidelines, and Private Attitudes to Antibiotics as Drivers of Antibiotic Prescribing

Author

Listed:
  • Fredrik Carlsson
  • Gunnar Jacobsson
  • Elina Lampi
  • Björn Rönnerstrand

Abstract

This study examines how doctors' personal views and norms on antibiotics affect their choices when prescribing antibiotics in Sweden. We analyze answers from two surveys, one in 2018 with 357 doctors about their own use and attitudes of antibiotics and another in 2019–2020 with 255 doctors about their prescription behavior. We find that doctors have more knowledge, and concern about antibiotic resistance and use than ordinary citizens, but they also use more antibiotics and are less ready to reduce their personal use of antibiotics. A doctor's choice not to prescribe antibiotics is strongly correlated with the descriptive treatment norms, that is, the perception of what most doctors would do when considering prescribing antibiotics and the guidelines for using antibiotics. There is also a strong correlation between professional and private attitudes: Although doctors themselves use more antibiotics than average people on average, those who are willing to refrain from using antibiotics as a private person are also more willing to avoid prescribing antibiotics to their patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Fredrik Carlsson & Gunnar Jacobsson & Elina Lampi & Björn Rönnerstrand, 2025. "Beliefs of Peers' Behavior, Clinical Guidelines, and Private Attitudes to Antibiotics as Drivers of Antibiotic Prescribing," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(2), pages 493-509, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:78:y:2025:i:2:p:493-509
    DOI: 10.1111/kykl.12428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12428
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/kykl.12428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:78:y:2025:i:2:p:493-509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.