IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/kyklos/v33y1980i1p3-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two Approaches To Quantify The Concept Of Equitable Income Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Tinbergen

Abstract

Three alternative definitions of equity are presented, which coincide under special conditions only. The author prefers the definition that equity means equality of welfare. This presupposes measurability of welfare (or utility). Two methods of measurement are discussed, called revealed or indirect and direct measurement. Concrete applications of both are shown, together with their shortcomings. In both cases equitable distribution is found to be less unequal than actual distribution in the Netherlands. Further research needed, on additional relevant determinants of utility and on learnability of some capabilities are formulated.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Tinbergen, 1980. "Two Approaches To Quantify The Concept Of Equitable Income Distribution," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 3-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:33:y:1980:i:1:p:3-15
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1980.tb02619.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1980.tb02619.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1980.tb02619.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:33:y:1980:i:1:p:3-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.