IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/kyklos/v23y1970i3p520-557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nutzen‐Kosten‐Analyse Für Städtische Verkehrsprojekte — Dargestellt Am Beispiel Der Unterpflasterstrassenbahn In Hannover

Author

Listed:
  • Helmut Hesse
  • Volker Arnold

Abstract

Since 1965 an underground‐railway is built in Hannover. For this project a cost‐benefit‐analysis was established. The present article discusses those problems, which will emerge whenever such an analysis for public transport investments will be carried out. To begin with it is shown that under certain conditions concerning the distribution it is possible to justify pure efficiency analyses. The result of the calculation points out that the present value of the difference between all the recorded benefits and costs amounts to DM 287,400,000.‐. The applied rate of discount is 6.5 per cent. The assumed economic life of the project is 50 years. The internal rate of return is 10.1 per cent. After the discussion of some problems of estimating the real costs of construction and operation, it is described how it was possible, to estimate the quantity of private transport, which will divert to the underground‐railway after its opening. Furthermore a technique is given, which allows the conversion of the benefits according to the diverted and the generated traffic into time savings. Time‐savings contribute 82 per cent to the total recorded benefits. An attempt was made, to justify the evaluation of those savings with average wage rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Helmut Hesse & Volker Arnold, 1970. "Nutzen‐Kosten‐Analyse Für Städtische Verkehrsprojekte — Dargestellt Am Beispiel Der Unterpflasterstrassenbahn In Hannover," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 520-557, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:23:y:1970:i:3:p:520-557
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1970.tb01029.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1970.tb01029.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1970.tb01029.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:23:y:1970:i:3:p:520-557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.