Author
Abstract
Decision theory is applied to a situation of conflict which a mother of two actually faced in an isolated home in the American Rocky Mountains. While the father was away on a trip which he thought to last seven days, the mother was bitten by a poisonous snake. She thought the bite to be fatal. To spare her two children, aged two months and two years, the agony of death by starvation, she decided to kill them. The mother faced a decision problem under uncertainty. A theoretical analysis of the situation shows which rational decision would have been optimal. However, a rational decision derived in an objective fashion is not free of subjective elements. Assigning utility measures to the possible types of death of the children, suppositions as to nature's strategies, and the choice of one of four established decision criteria are subjective. The criteria of Wald and Savage picture nature as a hostile opponent wanting to inflict greatest possible injury. The difference between them consists merely in the valuation of the disutility of death. Rational behaviour of the mother calls for selecting that strategy which promises the best of the worst possible outcomes. The Hurwicz criterion can accommodate all variations of nature's attitude, from malignant to benignant. According to the mother's optimism a distribution is supposed over nature's most favourable and unfavourable strategies. The probabilities of all other possible strategies are assumed to be zero. The criterion of Laplace assumes an indifferent nature. All possible strategies of nature are equally likely to eventuate. Three strategies are open to the mother, leave both children alive, kill one child, kill both children. Depending on the utility valuations the mother attaches to the different possible types of death, one of these strategies is optimal. If a decision is arrived by the Wald or Savage criterion a mixed strategy is superior to a pure one. The possibility of the childrens survival through the arrival of a stranger only affects the choice of the mother's strategy if she uses the Laplace criterion.
Suggested Citation
Heidi Sghelbert‐Syfrig, 1969.
"Ein Spiel Gegen Die Natur,"
Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 62-88, February.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:22:y:1969:i:1:p:62-88
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1969.tb02522.x
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:kyklos:v:22:y:1969:i:1:p:62-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0023-5962 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.