IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jrinsu/v91y2024i1p37-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does health spending among demographic groups compare to Affordable Care Act premium regulations?

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Hanson
  • Alexandra Minicozzi

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) substantially altered regulations in the nongroup and small group health insurance markets and those markets continue to receive significant policy attention. To understand how those markets have functioned in recent years and how they would be impacted by policy changes, we estimated enrollment and spending by age and sex using claims data covering enrollment in ACA risk‐adjusted plans in 2017–2019 and compared spending to a federal default age‐rating curve for premiums. Our results suggest that women aged 55–64 helped stabilize the nongroup market through high enrollment and relatively low spending. Men enrolled in the marketplace also subsidized other nongroup enrollees but to a lesser extent than expected. In fact, men aged25–50 enrolled in nongroup plans spent 18% more than their counterparts enrolled through a small employer. These unique spending patterns have interesting policy implications, including that lowering the Medicare eligibility age would likely increase premiums in the nongroup market.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Hanson & Alexandra Minicozzi, 2024. "How does health spending among demographic groups compare to Affordable Care Act premium regulations?," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 91(1), pages 37-55, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jrinsu:v:91:y:2024:i:1:p:37-55
    DOI: 10.1111/jori.12455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jori.12455
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jori.12455?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kurt Lavetti & Thomas DeLeire & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2023. "How do low‐income enrollees in the Affordable Care Act marketplaces respond to cost‐sharing?," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(1), pages 155-183, March.
    2. Congressional Budget Office, 2022. "Budgetary Effects of a Policy That Would Lower the Age of Eligibility for Medicare to 60," Reports 57918, Congressional Budget Office.
    3. Congressional Budget Office, 2019. "Federal Subsidies for Health Insurance Coverage for People Under Age 65: 2019 to 2029," Reports 55085, Congressional Budget Office.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benjamin R. Handel & Jonathan T. Kolstad, 2021. "The Affordable Care Act After a Decade: Industrial Organization of the Insurance Exchanges," NBER Working Papers 29178, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Daniel Béland & Michael Howlett & Philip Rocco & Alex Waddan, 2020. "Designing policy resilience: lessons from the Affordable Care Act," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(2), pages 269-289, June.
    3. Soheil Ghili & Ben Handel & Igal Hendel & Michael D. Whinston, 2019. "Optimal Long-Term Health Insurance Contracts: Characterization, Computation, and Welfare Effects," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2218R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Jul 2020.
    4. Jonathan Gruber & Benjamin D. Sommers, 2019. "The Affordable Care Act’s Effects on Patients, Providers and the Economy: What We’ve Learned So Far," NBER Working Papers 25932, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Aparna Soni, 2022. "The impact of the repeal of the federal individual insurance mandate on uninsurance," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 423-441, December.
    6. Maria Polyakova & Stephen P. Ryan, 2019. "Subsidy Targeting with Market Power," NBER Working Papers 26367, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Soheil Ghili & Ben Handel & Igal Hendel & Michael D. Whinston, 2019. "The Welfare Effects of Long-Term Health Insurance Contracts," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2218, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    8. Soheil Ghili & Ben Handel & Igal Hendel & Michael D. Whinston, 2019. "Optimal Long-Term Health Insurance Contracts: Characterization, Computation, and Welfare Effects," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2218R2, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised May 2021.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jrinsu:v:91:y:2024:i:1:p:37-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ariaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.