IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jregsc/v41y2001i2p277-299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost‐Benefit Analysis of Local Land Use Allocation Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • John F. McDonald

Abstract

This paper presents standard microeconomic models that are designed to be used in the cost‐benefit analysis of local land use decisions. The models connect these allocation decisions to outcomes in the urban land and labor markets so that costs and benefits can be measured. Benefits to the local jurisdiction of allocating land to industrial use exist if unemployed workers are employed, land values increase, or local tax revenues increase beyond the amount needed to provide the additional public services required.

Suggested Citation

  • John F. McDonald, 2001. "Cost‐Benefit Analysis of Local Land Use Allocation Decisions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 277-299, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:41:y:2001:i:2:p:277-299
    DOI: 10.1111/0022-4146.00217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00217
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/0022-4146.00217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Burnett, Perry & Cutler, Harvey & Thresher, Ray, 2007. "The Impact of Tourism for a Small City: A CGE Approach," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 37(3), pages 1-10.
    2. Rachel Weber & Saurav Dev Bhatta & David Merriman, 2003. "Does Tax Increment Financing Raise Urban Industrial Property Values?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(10), pages 2001-2021, September.
    3. Roy, Sandip, 2021. "Risk-informed land-use planning in the Indian context: A social cost-benefit analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Yao Lu & Min Zhou & Guoliang Ou & Zuo Zhang & Li He & Yuxiang Ma & Chaonan Ma & Jiating Tu & Siqi Li, 2021. "Sustainable Land-Use Allocation Model at a Watershed Level under Uncertainty," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Lijing Tang & Dongyan Wang, 2018. "Optimization of County-Level Land Resource Allocation through the Improvement of Allocation Efficiency from the Perspective of Sustainable Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Paul D. Gottlieb, 2006. "State Aid Formulas and the Local Incentive to Chase (or Shun) Ratables," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(7), pages 1087-1103, June.
    7. Jason Winfree & Jill McCluskey & Ron Mittelhammer, 2006. "Buyer-Type Effects in Conservation and Preservation Property Values," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 167-179, September.
    8. Paul F. Byrne, 2017. "Have Post-Kelo Restrictions on Eminent Domain Influenced State Economic Development?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 31(1), pages 81-91, February.
    9. Mark D. Partridge & Dan S. Rickman, 2012. "Integrating Regional Economic Development Analysis and Land Use Economics," Economics Working Paper Series 1203, Oklahoma State University, Department of Economics and Legal Studies in Business.
    10. Jin, Wanfu & Zhou, Chunshan & Zhang, Guojun, 2020. "Characteristics of state-owned construction land supply in Chinese cities by development stage and industry," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jregsc:v:41:y:2001:i:2:p:277-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-4146 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.