IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jpbect/v10y2008i3p423-439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of Weighted Majority Rules with Random Decision Power Distribution

Author

Listed:
  • DANIEL BEREND
  • YURI CHERNYAVSKY

Abstract

There is a large body of research studying the conditions under which majority decisions are best. In particular, in many circumstances, the probability of a group to decide correctly is higher than that of a random subgroup. Moreover, the latter probability increases as the subgroup size grows. Here we generalize those results by showing that, in the same setup, the simple majority rule is the most effective of all weighted majority rules when weights are distributed randomly between group members. For special families of weighted majority rules, rule effectiveness increases as we get “closer” to the simple majority rule.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Berend & Yuri Chernyavsky, 2008. "Effectiveness of Weighted Majority Rules with Random Decision Power Distribution," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 10(3), pages 423-439, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:10:y:2008:i:3:p:423-439
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2008.00370.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2008.00370.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2008.00370.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jpbect:v:10:y:2008:i:3:p:423-439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/apettea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.