Author
Listed:
- Sujit K. Sahu
- Mark R. Bass
- Carla Sabariego
- Alarcos Cieza
- Carolina S. Fellinghauer
- Somnath Chatterji
Abstract
Generalized partial credit models (GPCMs) are ubiquitous in many applications in the health and medical sciences that use item response theory. Such polytomous item response models have a great many uses ranging from assessing and predicting an individual's latent trait to ordering the items to test the effectiveness of the test instrumentation. By implementing these models in a full Bayesian framework, computed through the use of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods implemented in the efficient STAN software package, the paper exploits the full inferential capability of GPCMs. The GPCMs include explanatory covariate effects which allow simultaneous estimation of regression and item parameters. The Bayesian methods for ranking the items by using the Fisher information criterion are implemented by using Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. This allows us to propagate fully and to ascertain uncertainty in the inferences by calculating the posterior predictive distribution of the item‐specific Fisher information criterion in a novel manner that has not been exploited in the literature before. Lastly, we propose a new Monte Carlo method for predicting the latent trait score of a new individual by approximating the relevant Bayesian predictive distribution. Data from a model disability survey carried out in Sri Lanka by the World Health Organization and the World Bank are used to illustrate the methods. The approaches proposed are shown to provide simultaneous model‐based inference for all aspects of disability which can be explained by environmental and socio‐economic factors.
Suggested Citation
Sujit K. Sahu & Mark R. Bass & Carla Sabariego & Alarcos Cieza & Carolina S. Fellinghauer & Somnath Chatterji, 2020.
"A full Bayesian implementation of a generalized partial credit model with an application to an international disability survey,"
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(1), pages 131-150, January.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:69:y:2020:i:1:p:131-150
DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12385
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:69:y:2020:i:1:p:131-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.