IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v64y2015i1p157-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pseudoempirical-likelihood-based method using calibration for longitudinal data with dropout

Author

Listed:
  • Baojiang Chen
  • Xiao-Hua Zhou
  • Gary Chan

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="rssc12063-abs-0001"> In observational studies, interest mainly lies in estimation of the population level relationship between the explanatory variables and dependent variables, and the estimation is often undertaken by using a sample of longitudinal data. In some situations, the longitudinal data sample features biases and loss of estimation efficiency due to non-random dropout. However, inclusion of population level information can increase estimation efficiency. We propose an empirical-likelihood-based method to incorporate population level information in a longitudinal study with dropout. The population level information is incorporated via constraints on functions of the parameters, and non-random dropout bias is corrected by using a weighted generalized estimating equations method. We provide a three-step estimation procedure that makes computation easier. Some commonly used methods are compared in simulation studies, which demonstrate that our proposed method can correct the non-random dropout bias and increase the estimation efficiency, especially for small sample sizes or when the missing proportion is high. In some situations, the improvement in efficiency is substantial. Finally, we apply the method to an Alzheimer's disease study.

Suggested Citation

  • Baojiang Chen & Xiao-Hua Zhou & Gary Chan, 2015. "Pseudoempirical-likelihood-based method using calibration for longitudinal data with dropout," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(1), pages 157-174, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:64:y:2015:i:1:p:157-174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/rssc.2014.64.issue-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:64:y:2015:i:1:p:157-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.