IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v57y2008i1p89-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An application of multinomial logistic regression to estimating performance of a multiple-screening test with incomplete verification

Author

Listed:
  • Chris J. Lloyd
  • Donald J. Frommer

Abstract

The paper describes a method of estimating the performance of a multiple-screening test where those who test negatively do not have their true disease status determined. The methodology is motivated by a data set on 49927 subjects who were given "K"=6 binary tests for bowel cancer. A complicating factor is that individuals may have polyps in the bowel, a condition that the screening test is not designed to detect but which may be worth diagnosing. The methodology is based on a multinomial logit model for Pr("S"|"R" 6 ), the probability distribution of patient status "S" (healthy, polyps or diseased) conditional on the results "R" 6 from six binary tests. An advantage of the methodology described is that the modelling is data driven. In particular, we require no assumptions about correlation within subjects, the relative sensitivity of the "K" tests or the conditional independence of the tests. The model leads to simple estimates of the trade-off between different errors as the number of tests is varied, presented graphically by using receiver operating characteristic curves. Finally, the model allows us to estimate better protocols for assigning subjects to the disease group, as well as the gains in accuracy from these protocols. Copyright 2008 Royal Statistical Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris J. Lloyd & Donald J. Frommer, 2008. "An application of multinomial logistic regression to estimating performance of a multiple-screening test with incomplete verification," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 57(1), pages 89-102.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:57:y:2008:i:1:p:89-102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Alfò & Dankmar Böhning & Irene Rocchetti, 2021. "Upper bound estimators of the population size based on ordinal models for capture‐recapture experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 237-248, March.
    2. Chinyereugo M Umemneku Chikere & Kevin Wilson & Sara Graziadio & Luke Vale & A Joy Allen, 2019. "Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:57:y:2008:i:1:p:89-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.