IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v55y2006i3p379-396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing survey data with incomplete responses by using a method based on empirical likelihood

Author

Listed:
  • Denis H. Y. Leung
  • Jing Qin

Abstract

Summary. In many surveys, missing response is a common problem. As an example, Zahner, Jacobs, Freeman and Trainor analysed data from a study of child psychopathology in the State of Connecticut, USA. In that study, the response variable, psychopathology, was inferred from questions that were addressed to teachers of the children and was subject to a high level of missingness. However, the missing responses were supplemented by surrogate information that was provided by the parents and/or the primary care providers of the children. In such a situation, it is conceivable that the supplemental information can be used to recover some of the information that has been lost in the cases with missing response. This paper considers a method using empirical likelihood. Empirical likelihood is well known in providing nonparametric inference. But its application has largely been confined to complete‐data situations. The method proposed exploits the semiparametric nature of empirical likelihood. The method gives consistent estimates if the cases with non‐missing responses form a random sample of the population. In large samples, the method behaves similarly to a regression estimate that is applied to estimating equations. The method is easy to implement with standard statistical packages. In a small sample study, the method was found to give favourable results, when compared with existing methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Denis H. Y. Leung & Jing Qin, 2006. "Analysing survey data with incomplete responses by using a method based on empirical likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 55(3), pages 379-396, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:55:y:2006:i:3:p:379-396
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2006.00542.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2006.00542.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2006.00542.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Jones & Malcolm J Beynon & David Pickernell & Gary Packham, 2013. "Evaluating the Impact of Different Training Methods on SME Business Performance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(1), pages 56-81, February.
    2. María Mar Rueda & Juan Muñoz, 2011. "Estimation of poverty measures with auxiliary information in sample surveys," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 687-700, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:55:y:2006:i:3:p:379-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.