IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v76y2014i4p683-712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimates and standard errors for ratios of normalizing constants from multiple Markov chains via regeneration

Author

Listed:
  • Hani Doss
  • Aixin Tan

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="rssb12049-abs-0001"> In the classical biased sampling problem, we have k densities π 1 ( · ) , … , π k ( · ) , each known up to a normalizing constant, i.e., for l=1, …,k, π l ( · ) = ν l ( · ) / m l , where ν l ( · ) is a known function and m l is an unknown constant. For each l, we have an independent and identically distributed sample from π l , and the problem is to estimate the ratios m l / m s for all l and all s. This problem arises frequently in several situations in both frequentist and Bayesian inference. An estimate of the ratios was developed and studied by Vardi and his co-workers over two decades ago, and there has been much subsequent work on this problem from many perspectives. In spite of this, there are no rigorous results in the literature on how to estimate the standard error of the estimate. We present a class of estimates of the ratios of normalizing constants that are appropriate for the case where the samples from the π l s are not necessarily independent and identically distributed sequences but are Markov chains. We also develop an approach based on regenerative simulation for obtaining standard errors for the estimates of ratios of normalizing constants. These standard error estimates are valid for both the independent and identically distributed samples case and the Markov chain case.

Suggested Citation

  • Hani Doss & Aixin Tan, 2014. "Estimates and standard errors for ratios of normalizing constants from multiple Markov chains via regeneration," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 76(4), pages 683-712, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:76:y:2014:i:4:p:683-712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/rssb.2014.76.issue-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:76:y:2014:i:4:p:683-712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.