Author
Listed:
- J. G. Ibrahim
- S. R. Lipsitz
- M.‐H. Chen
Abstract
We propose a method for estimating parameters in generalized linear models with missing covariates and a non‐ignorable missing data mechanism. We use a multinomial model for the missing data indicators and propose a joint distribution for them which can be written as a sequence of one‐dimensional conditional distributions, with each one‐dimensional conditional distribution consisting of a logistic regression. We allow the covariates to be either categorical or continuous. The joint covariate distribution is also modelled via a sequence of one‐dimensional conditional distributions, and the response variable is assumed to be completely observed. We derive the E‐ and M‐steps of the EM algorithm with non‐ignorable missing covariate data. For categorical covariates, we derive a closed form expression for the E‐ and M‐steps of the EM algorithm for obtaining the maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs). For continuous covariates, we use a Monte Carlo version of the EM algorithm to obtain the MLEs via the Gibbs sampler. Computational techniques for Gibbs sampling are proposed and implemented. The parametric form of the assumed missing data mechanism itself is not `testable' from the data, and thus the non‐ignorable modelling considered here can be viewed as a sensitivity analysis concerning a more complicated model. Therefore, although a model may have `passed' the tests for a certain missing data mechanism, this does not mean that we have captured, even approximately, the correct missing data mechanism. Hence, model checking for the missing data mechanism and sensitivity analyses play an important role in this problem and are discussed in detail. Several simulations are given to demonstrate the methodology. In addition, a real data set from a melanoma cancer clinical trial is presented to illustrate the methods proposed.
Suggested Citation
J. G. Ibrahim & S. R. Lipsitz & M.‐H. Chen, 1999.
"Missing covariates in generalized linear models when the missing data mechanism is non‐ignorable,"
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(1), pages 173-190.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:61:y:1999:i:1:p:173-190
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9868.00170
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:61:y:1999:i:1:p:173-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.