IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssb/v59y1997i1p205-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Optimality of Prediction‐based Selection Criteria and the Convergence Rates of Estimators

Author

Listed:
  • Naomi Altman
  • Christian Léger

Abstract

Several estimators of squared prediction error have been suggested for use in model and bandwidth selection problems. Among these are cross‐validation, generalized cross‐validation and a number of related techniques based on the residual sum of squares. For many situations with squared error loss, e.g. nonparametric smoothing, these estimators have been shown to be asymptotically optimal in the sense that in large samples the estimator minimizing the selection criterion also minimizes squared error loss. However, cross‐validation is known not to be asymptotically optimal for some `easy' location problems. We consider selection criteria based on estimators of squared prediction risk for choosing between location estimators. We show that criteria based on adjusted residual sum of squares are not asymptotically optimal for choosing between asymptotically normal location estimators that converge at rate n1/2but are when the rate of convergence is slower. We also show that leave‐one‐out cross‐validation is not asymptotically optimal for choosing between √n‐differentiable statistics but leave‐d‐out cross‐validation is optimal when d∞ at the appropriate rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Naomi Altman & Christian Léger, 1997. "On the Optimality of Prediction‐based Selection Criteria and the Convergence Rates of Estimators," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(1), pages 205-216.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:59:y:1997:i:1:p:205-216
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9868.00064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00064
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9868.00064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssb:v:59:y:1997:i:1:p:205-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.