IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v185y2022i4p1931-1951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using randomized rounding of linear programs to obtain unweighted natural strata that balance many covariates

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine Brumberg
  • Dylan S. Small
  • Paul R. Rosenbaum

Abstract

In causal inference, natural strata are a new compromise between conventional strata and matching in a fixed ratio, say pair matching or matching two controls to each treated individual. Like matching in a fixed ratio, natural strata: (a) do not require weights, (b) balance many measured covariates beyond those that define the strata and (c) provide closer balance for a measured continuous covariate coarsely cut to form strata. Unlike matching in a fixed ratio, the ratio of controls to treated individuals need not be an integer, so if the data permit a fixed ratio comparison of 1‐to‐2.5 or even 1‐to‐0.75, then these ratios are possible using natural strata. Optimal natural strata are defined by a moderate number of fixed strata plus an integer program that minimizes the imbalance in many other measured covariates that are not used to specify the strata. Solving large integer programs is computationally difficult. A tool in the theory of approximation algorithms is ‘randomized rounding of a linear program’ to produce an integer solution: a fractional solution to a linear program defines a probability distribution for an integer‐valued random variable which is sampled. We apply this tool in a new way to produce natural strata and develop new properties of randomized rounding in this context. When proportional strata are impractical, we approximate them by minimizing the earthmover distance to proportionality. The method is applied to study birth outcomes for older and younger mothers in the United States in 2018. An R package natstrat is available at CRAN.

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine Brumberg & Dylan S. Small & Paul R. Rosenbaum, 2022. "Using randomized rounding of linear programs to obtain unweighted natural strata that balance many covariates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 1931-1951, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:185:y:2022:i:4:p:1931-1951
    DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12848
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssa.12848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. Kalton, 1968. "Standardization: A Technique to Control for Extraneous Variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 17(2), pages 118-136, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barry I. Graubard & Edward L. Korn, 1999. "Predictive Margins with Survey Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 652-659, June.
    2. Clifford Clogg, 1978. "Adjustment of rates using multiplicative models," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 15(4), pages 523-539, November.
    3. Roderick J.A. Little & Thomas W. Pullum, 1979. "The General Linear Model and Direct Standardization," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 7(4), pages 475-501, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:185:y:2022:i:4:p:1931-1951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.