IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v183y2020i3p1005-1027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the association between discrete event time series with applications to digital forensics

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Galbraith
  • Padhraic Smyth
  • Hal S. Stern

Abstract

We consider the problem of quantifying the degree of association between pairs of discrete event time series, with potential applications in forensic and cybersecurity settings. We focus in particular on the case where two associated event series exhibit temporal clustering such that the occurrence of one type of event at a particular time increases the likelihood that an event of the other type will also occur nearby in time. We pursue a non‐parametric approach to the problem and investigate various score functions to quantify association, including characteristics of marked point processes and summary statistics of interevent times. Two techniques are proposed for assessing the significance of the measured degree of association: a population‐based approach to calculating score‐based likelihood ratios when a sample from a relevant population is available, and a resampling approach to computing coincidental match probabilities when only a single pair of event series is available. The methods are applied to simulated data and to two real world data sets consisting of logs of computer activity and achieve accurate results across all data sets.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Galbraith & Padhraic Smyth & Hal S. Stern, 2020. "Quantifying the association between discrete event time series with applications to digital forensics," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 1005-1027, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:183:y:2020:i:3:p:1005-1027
    DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12549
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssa.12549?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myra Spiliopoulou & Bamshad Mobasher & Bettina Berendt & Miki Nakagawa, 2003. "A Framework for the Evaluation of Session Reconstruction Heuristics in Web-Usage Analysis," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 171-190, May.
    2. Silvia Bozza & Franco Taroni & Raymond Marquis & Matthieu Schmittbuhl, 2008. "Probabilistic evaluation of handwriting evidence: likelihood ratio for authorship," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 57(3), pages 329-341, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jozef Kapusta & Michal Munk & Martin Drlik, 2018. "Website Structure Improvement Based on the Combination of Selected Web Structure and Web Usage Mining Methods," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(06), pages 1743-1776, November.
    2. Jason Jung, 2014. "Measuring trustworthiness of information diffusion by risk discovery process in social networking services," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1325-1336, May.
    3. Goić, Marcel & Jerath, Kinshuk & Kalyanam, Kirthi, 2022. "The roles of multiple channels in predicting website visits and purchases: Engagers versus closers," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 656-677.
    4. Rakesh Gupta & Amitava Bagchi & Sumit Sarkar, 2007. "Improving Linkage of Web Pages," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 127-136, February.
    5. Dong Joon Lee & Besiki Stvilia & Seungyeon Ha & Douglas Hahn, 2023. "The structure and priorities of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities: A case of institutional research information management system," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(2), pages 186-204, February.
    6. Jonathan J. Koehler, 2011. "If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(s1), pages 21-48, December.
    7. Ivo Alberink & Annabel Bolck & Sonja Menges, 2013. "Posterior likelihood ratios for evaluation of forensic trace evidence given a two-level model on the data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(12), pages 2579-2600, December.
    8. Yicheng Song & Nachiketa Sahoo & Shuba Srinivasan & Chrysanthos Dellarocas, 2022. "Uncovering Characteristic Response Paths of a Population," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1661-1680, May.
    9. Jan Hannig & Hari Iyer, 2022. "Testing for calibration discrepancy of reported likelihood ratios in forensic science," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 267-301, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:183:y:2020:i:3:p:1005-1027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.