IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v170y2007i3p825-839.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who captures the marks for the Petersen estimator?

Author

Listed:
  • I. B. J. Goudie
  • M. Goudie

Abstract

Summary. We examine the claim that the well‐known Petersen estimator which is used in population size estimation was not in fact used by the scientist after whom it is named. We show how, in the early years of the last century, the modern use of the Petersen estimator grew from that of the fishing coefficient. Contending with the somewhat conflicting claims that were made at the time, and what by modern standards is poor referencing of sources, we investigate where the credit lies for these concepts, and the principles and protocols which support them. We assess also how far attributions of credit were affected by practical considerations, and the history of the estimator by the nature of the problems being pursued. We identify scientists whose early work on marking and estimating fish populations deserves more credit than it has received.

Suggested Citation

  • I. B. J. Goudie & M. Goudie, 2007. "Who captures the marks for the Petersen estimator?," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(3), pages 825-839, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:170:y:2007:i:3:p:825-839
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00479.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00479.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00479.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Brown & Owen Abbott & Ian Diamond, 2006. "Dependence in the 2001 one‐number census project," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(4), pages 883-902, October.
    2. S. T. Buckland & I. B. J. Goudie & D. L. Borchers, 2000. "Wildlife Population Assessment: Past Developments and Future Directions," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Russell B. Millar & Renate Meyer, 2000. "Non‐linear state space modelling of fisheries biomass dynamics by using Metropolis‐Hastings within‐Gibbs sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 49(3), pages 327-342.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang Xuan Mao & Ruochen Huang & Sijia Zhang, 2017. "Petersen estimator, Chapman adjustment, list effects, and heterogeneity," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 167-173, March.
    2. James N McNair & Carl R Ruetz III & Ariana Carlson & Jiyeon Suh, 2018. "Reducing effects of dispersal on the bias of 2-sample mark-recapture estimators of stream fish abundance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-31, August.
    3. Edgar Salgado Chavez, 2018. "Growing Up in a War: The Shaping of Trust and Identity After Conflict in Peru," Working Paper Series 0618, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    4. Salgado Chavez, Edgar, 2017. "Essays on beliefs, democracy and local labor markets: an empirical examination for Peru," Economics PhD Theses 0717, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bakker Bart F.M. & Heijden Peter G.M. van der & Scholtus Sander, 2015. "Preface," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 31(3), pages 349-355, September.
    2. Chaloupka, Milani & Balazs, George, 2007. "Using Bayesian state-space modelling to assess the recovery and harvest potential of the Hawaiian green sea turtle stock," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 93-109.
    3. Christoph Berninger & Almond Stocker & David Rugamer, 2020. "A Bayesian Time-Varying Autoregressive Model for Improved Short- and Long-Term Prediction," Papers 2006.05750, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    4. Elżbieta Gołata, 2016. "Shift In Methodology And Population Census Quality," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 17(4), pages 631-658, December.
    5. Jennifer B Smith & Bryan S Stevens & Dwayne R Etter & David M Williams, 2020. "Performance of spatial capture-recapture models with repurposed data: Assessing estimator robustness for retrospective applications," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Min-Je Choi & Do-Hoon Kim, 2020. "Assessment and Management of Small Yellow Croaker ( Larimichthys polyactis ) Stocks in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Devin S. Johnson & Jennifer A. Hoeting, 2003. "Autoregressive Models for Capture-Recapture Data: A Bayesian Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 341-350, June.
    8. Roa-Ureta, Ruben H. & Santos, Miguel N. & Leitão, Francisco, 2019. "Modelling long-term fisheries data to resolve the attraction versus production dilemma of artificial reefs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 407(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Gimenez, Olivier & Rossi, Vivien & Choquet, Rémi & Dehais, Camille & Doris, Blaise & Varella, Hubert & Vila, Jean-Pierre & Pradel, Roger, 2007. "State-space modelling of data on marked individuals," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 206(3), pages 431-438.
    10. Ji-Hoon Choi & Jae-Bong Lee & Sang-Chul Yoon & Do-Hoon Kim, 2021. "A Bioeconomic Analysis of the Sandfish ( Arctoscopus japonicus ) Management Policies of the Eastern Sea Danish Fishery in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Ruiz, Javier & Prieto, Laura & Astorga, Diana, 2012. "A model for temperature control of jellyfish (Cotylorhiza tuberculata) outbreaks: A causal analysis in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 233(C), pages 59-69.
    12. Su, Zhenming & Peterman, Randall M., 2012. "Performance of a Bayesian state-space model of semelparous species for stock-recruitment data subject to measurement error," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 76-89.
    13. Gołata Elżbieta, 2016. "Shift in Methodology and Population Census Quality," Statistics in Transition New Series, Statistics Poland, vol. 17(4), pages 631-658, December.
    14. Dunham, Kylee & Grand, James B., 2016. "Effects of model complexity and priors on estimation using sequential importance sampling/resampling for species conservation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 340(C), pages 28-36.
    15. Axel Finke & Ruth King & Alexandros Beskos & Petros Dellaportas, 2019. "Efficient Sequential Monte Carlo Algorithms for Integrated Population Models," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(2), pages 204-224, June.
    16. Baffour Bernard & Brown James J. & Smith Peter W.F., 2021. "Latent Class Analysis for Estimating an Unknown Population Size – with Application to Censuses," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 37(3), pages 673-697, September.
    17. Chauvenet, Alienor L.M. & Gill, Robin M.A. & Smith, Graham C. & Ward, Alastair I. & Massei, Giovanna, 2017. "Quantifying the bias in density estimated from distance sampling and camera trapping of unmarked individuals," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 350(C), pages 79-86.
    18. Russell B. Millar, 2004. "Sensitivity of Bayes Estimators to Hyper-Parameters with an Application to Maximum Yield from Fisheries," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 536-542, June.
    19. Ruth King & Stephen P. Brooks & Chiara Mazzetta & Stephen N. Freeman & Byron J. T. Morgan, 2008. "Identifying and diagnosing population declines: a Bayesian assessment of lapwings in the UK," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 57(5), pages 609-632, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:170:y:2007:i:3:p:825-839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.