IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v163y2000i1p5-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical review by research ethics committees

Author

Listed:
  • P. Williamson
  • J. L. Hutton
  • J. Bliss
  • J. Blunt
  • M. J. Campbell
  • R. Nicholson

Abstract

This paper discusses some of the issues surrounding statistical review by research ethics committees (RECs). A survey of local RECs in 1997 revealed that only 27/184 (15%) included a statistician member at that time, although 70/175 (40%) recognized the need for such. The role of the statistician member is considered and the paper includes a summary of a meeting of the Royal Statistical Society to discuss statistical issues that frequently arise in the review of REC applications. A list of minimum qualifications which RECs should expect from anyone claiming to be a statistician would be useful, together with a list of statisticians who are well qualified and willing to serve on RECs, and a list of training courses for REC members covering the appropriate statistical issues.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Williamson & J. L. Hutton & J. Bliss & J. Blunt & M. J. Campbell & R. Nicholson, 2000. "Statistical review by research ethics committees," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 163(1), pages 5-13.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:163:y:2000:i:1:p:5-13
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-985X.00152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00152
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-985X.00152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephen Senn & Dipti Amin & Rosemary A. Bailey & Sheila M. Bird & Barbara Bogacka & Peter Colman & Andrew Garrett & Andrew Grieve & Peter Lachmann, 2007. "Statistical issues in first‐in‐man studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(3), pages 517-579, July.
    2. Walters, SJ & Brazier, JE, 2002. "Sample sizes for the SF-6D preference based measure of health from the SF-36: a practical guide," MPRA Paper 29742, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:163:y:2000:i:1:p:5-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.