IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v162y1999i2p247-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A methodological strategy for a one‐number census in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • J. J. Brown
  • I. D. Diamond
  • R. L. Chambers
  • L. J. Buckner
  • A. D. Teague

Abstract

As a result of lessons learnt from the 1991 census, a research programme was set up to seek improvements in census methodology. Underenumeration has been placed top of the agenda in this programme, and every effort is being made to achieve as high a coverage as possible in the 2001 census. In recognition, however, that 100% coverage will never be achieved, the one‐number census (ONC) project was established to measure the degree of underenumeration in the 2001 census and, if possible, to adjust fully the outputs from the census for that undercount. A key component of this adjustment process is a census coverage survey (CCS). This paper presents an overview of the ONC project, focusing on the design and analysis methodology for the CCS. It also presents results that allow the reader to evaluate the robustness of this methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • J. J. Brown & I. D. Diamond & R. L. Chambers & L. J. Buckner & A. D. Teague, 1999. "A methodological strategy for a one‐number census in the UK," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 162(2), pages 247-267.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:162:y:1999:i:2:p:247-267
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-985X.00133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00133
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-985X.00133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernard Baffour & Thomas King & Paolo Valente, 2013. "The Modern Census: Evolution, Examples and Evaluation," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 81(3), pages 407-425, December.
    2. Philip Redfern, 2004. "An alternative view of the 2001 census and future census taking," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 167(2), pages 209-228, May.
    3. repec:bla:jorssa:v:167:y:2004:i:2:p:229-248 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Fiona Steele & James Brown & Ray Chambers, 2002. "A controlled donor imputation system for a one‐number census," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 165(3), pages 495-522, October.
    5. Lucie Dostál & Siegfried Gabler & Matthias Ganninger & Ralf Münnich, 2016. "Frame Correction Modelling with Applications to the German Register-Assisted Census 2011," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(3), pages 904-920, September.
    6. James Brown & Owen Abbott & Ian Diamond, 2006. "Dependence in the 2001 one‐number census project," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 169(4), pages 883-902, October.
    7. Gerritse Susanna C. & Heijden Peter G.M. van der & Bakker Bart F.M., 2015. "Sensitivity of Population Size Estimation for Violating Parametric Assumptions in Log-linear Models," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 31(3), pages 357-379, September.
    8. Chipperfield James & Brown James & Bell Philip, 2017. "Estimating the Count Error in the Australian Census," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(1), pages 43-59, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:162:y:1999:i:2:p:247-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.