IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v159y1996i1p49-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trial Design Based on Surrogate End Points — Application to Comparison of Different Breast Screening Frequencies

Author

Listed:
  • N. E. Day
  • S. W. Duffy

Abstract

This paper deals with the use of surrogates for the true end point in clinical or prevention trials to shorten the duration of the trial and to increase the power. It is shown that the estimate of the relative hazard using predicted mortality from prognostic variables has lower variance than the estimate using actual observed mortality. The strategy is applied to the design of the British Breast Screening Frequency Trial. In this situation, screening more frequently can be expected to lead to reduced mortality by increasing the number of cancers detected by screening, and by the change in characteristics of the tumours brought about by earlier detection. We demonstrate how the use of surrogate variables to predict mortality leads to a threefold reduction in the variance of the relative hazard, and a result 10 years earlier than would be provided by the use of mortality itself. We suggest that the use of surrogate outcomes, although clearly hazardous or even unacceptable for investigating issues of primary importance, may have a useful role in resolving subsidiary issues.

Suggested Citation

  • N. E. Day & S. W. Duffy, 1996. "Trial Design Based on Surrogate End Points — Application to Comparison of Different Breast Screening Frequencies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 159(1), pages 49-60, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:159:y:1996:i:1:p:49-60
    DOI: 10.2307/2983468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2983468
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/2983468?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neil Hawkins & Gerry Richardson & Alex J Sutton & Nicola J Cooper & Chris Griffiths & Anne Rogers & Peter Bower, 2012. "Surrogates, meta‐analysis and cost‐effectiveness modelling: a combined analytic approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(6), pages 742-756, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:159:y:1996:i:1:p:49-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.