IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/joares/v35y1997i2p239-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A theoretical examination of the market reaction to auditors' qualifications

Author

Listed:
  • Melumad, ND
  • Ziv, A

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Melumad, ND & Ziv, A, 1997. "A theoretical examination of the market reaction to auditors' qualifications," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 239-256.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:joares:v:35:y:1997:i:2:p:239-256
    DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2491363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2491363.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2491363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dennis M. O'Reilly & Robert A. Leitch & Brad Tuttle, 2006. "An Experimental Test of the Interaction of the Insurance and Information†Signaling Hypotheses in Auditing," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1), pages 267-289, March.
    2. Charles J. P. Chen & Xijia Su & Ronald Zhao, 2000. "An Emerging Market's Reaction to Initial Modified Audit Opinions: Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 429-455, September.
    3. Eli Amir & Amir Ziv, 1997. "Economic Consequences of Alternative Adoption Rules for New Accounting Standards," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 543-568, September.
    4. David Abad & Juan P. Sánchez-Ballesta & José Yagüe, 2017. "Audit opinions and information asymmetry in the stock market," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(2), pages 565-595, June.
    5. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Auditing; Qualified opinion; Market reaction; Litigation exposure;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:joares:v:35:y:1997:i:2:p:239-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-8456 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.