IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v76y2025i4p645-648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ChatGPT for complex text evaluation tasks

Author

Listed:
  • Mike Thelwall

Abstract

ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) have been successful at natural and computer language processing tasks with varying degrees of complexity. This brief communication summarizes the lessons learned from a series of investigations into its use for the complex text analysis task of research quality evaluation. In summary, ChatGPT is very good at understanding and carrying out complex text processing tasks in the sense of producing plausible responses with minimum input from the researcher. Nevertheless, its outputs require systematic testing to assess their value because they can be misleading. In contrast to simple tasks, the outputs from complex tasks are highly varied and better results can be obtained by repeating the prompts multiple times in different sessions and averaging the ChatGPT outputs. Varying ChatGPT's configuration parameters from their defaults does not seem to be useful, except for the length of the output requested.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike Thelwall, 2025. "ChatGPT for complex text evaluation tasks," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 76(4), pages 645-648, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:76:y:2025:i:4:p:645-648
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24966
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24966?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:76:y:2025:i:4:p:645-648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.