IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v61y2010i7p1360-1376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study on communication structures of Chinese journals in the social sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Ping Zhou
  • Xinning Su
  • Loet Leydesdorff

Abstract

We argue that the communication structures in the Chinese social sciences have not yet been sufficiently reformed. Citation patterns among Chinese domestic journals in three subject areas—political science and Marxism, library and information science, and economics—are compared with their counterparts internationally. Like their colleagues in the natural and life sciences, Chinese scholars in the social sciences provide fewer references to journal publications than their international counterparts; like their international colleagues, social scientists provide fewer references than natural sciences. The resulting citation networks, therefore, are sparse. Nevertheless, the citation structures clearly suggest that the Chinese social sciences are far less specialized in terms of disciplinary delineations than their international counterparts. Marxism studies are more established than political science in China. In terms of the impact of the Chinese political system on academic fields, disciplines closely related to the political system are less specialized than those weakly related. In the discussion section, we explore reasons that may cause the current stagnation and provide policy recommendations.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Ping Zhou & Xinning Su & Loet Leydesdorff, 2010. "A comparative study on communication structures of Chinese journals in the social sciences," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(7), pages 1360-1376, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:61:y:2010:i:7:p:1360-1376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meijun Liu & Xiao Hu & Jiang Li, 2018. "Knowledge flow in China’s humanities and social sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 607-626, March.
    2. Ping Zhou & Youneng Pan, 2015. "A comparative analysis of publication portfolios of selected economies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(2), pages 825-842, November.
    3. Liu, Weishu & Hu, Guangyuan & Tang, Li & Wang, Yuandi, 2015. "China's global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (1978–2013)," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 555-569.
    4. Saeed-Ul Hassan & Peter Haddawy, 2013. "Measuring international knowledge flows and scholarly impact of scientific research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(1), pages 163-179, January.
    5. Yang Liu & Jinyuan Ma & Huanyu Song & Ziniu Qian & Xiao Lin, 2021. "Chinese Universities’ Cross-Border Research Collaboration in the Social Sciences and Its Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Guijie Zhang & Luning Liu & Fangfang Wei, 2019. "Key nodes mining in the inventor–author knowledge diffusion network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 721-735, March.
    7. Saeed-Ul Hassan & Peter Haddawy, 2015. "Analyzing knowledge flows of scientific literature through semantic links: a case study in the field of energy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(1), pages 33-46, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:61:y:2010:i:7:p:1360-1376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.