IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jindec/v37y1989i4p411-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Antitrust Litigation on Shareholder Return

Author

Listed:
  • Huth, William L
  • MacDonald, Don N

Abstract

The hypothesis that antitrust litigation will redistribute economic power is examined using an event study framework. District and appellate court findings involving firms litigating antitrust issues and the Telex v. IBM case are examined. The results indicated that shareholders of firms involved in the litigation experienced decreases (increases) in return when either court finding was unfavorable (favorable). The Telex v. IBM results indicated that the district court's finding against IBM resulted in significant positive abnormal returns for computer industry firms. Abnormal negative returns were also found in the period surrounding the appellate court reversal. Copyright 1989 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Huth, William L & MacDonald, Don N, 1989. "The Impact of Antitrust Litigation on Shareholder Return," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 411-426, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jindec:v:37:y:1989:i:4:p:411-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-1821%28198906%2937%3A4%3C411%3ATIOALO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Y&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Martin Katz & Michael J Bommarito II & Tyler Soellinger & James Ming Chen, 2015. "Law on the Market? Abnormal Stock Returns and Supreme Court Decision-Making," Papers 1508.05751, arXiv.org, revised May 2017.
    2. Davis, Yehuda & Govindaraj, Suresh & Suslava, Kate, 2024. "Does the stock market anticipate events and supreme court decisions in corporate cases?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    3. Michael Cichello & Douglas Lamdin, 2006. "Event Studies and the Analysis of Antitrust," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 229-245.
    4. Svetlana B. Avdasheva & Dina V. Tsytsulina, 2014. "The Effects Of Competition Policy: Merger Approval, Entry Barrier Removal, Antitrust Enforcement Compared," HSE Working papers WP BRP 34/FE/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    5. Detre, Joshua D. & Golub, Alla A., 2004. "A Reexamination Of The Profitability Of Price Fixing Using Stock Price Movement: Has New Antitrust Legislation Been A More Effective Deterrent Of Price Fixing?," Staff Papers 28668, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jindec:v:37:y:1989:i:4:p:411-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-1821 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.