IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jecsur/v33y2019i2p481-515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Precautionary Saving: A Review Of The Empirical Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Alba Lugilde
  • Roberto Bande
  • Dolores Riveiro

Abstract

Standard macroeconomic models show that uncertainty plays a significant role in consumption and saving decisions under rather mild conditions, namely the convexity of the marginal utility of consumption. Increased uncertainty generates a positive extra saving, the so‐called ‘precautionary saving’. Although this hypothesis has been tested by a large number of authors, both at macro and micro level, the empirical results are not conclusive, and the main conclusion than can be drawn is that there is neither consensus on the intensity of that motive for saving, nor on the most appropriate measure of uncertainty. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the empirical literature discussing the main controversial issues and the different approaches followed by the studies addressing empirically the test of precautionary saving.

Suggested Citation

  • Alba Lugilde & Roberto Bande & Dolores Riveiro, 2019. "Precautionary Saving: A Review Of The Empirical Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 481-515, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:33:y:2019:i:2:p:481-515
    DOI: 10.1111/joes.12284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12284
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joes.12284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:33:y:2019:i:2:p:481-515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0950-0804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.