IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v63y2025i2p564-589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Do Politicians Think of Technocratic Institutions? Attitudes in the European Parliament Towards the European Central Bank

Author

Listed:
  • Federico M. Ferrara
  • Donato Masciandaro
  • Manuela Moschella
  • Davide Romelli

Abstract

Technocracy has come to be increasingly regarded as a threat to representative democracy. Significant attention has thus been recently devoted to exploring public preferences towards technocratic institutions. Elected policy‐makers' attitudes have instead not been investigated as systematically. This article fills this gap by examining politicians' views on central banks. Based on an original elite survey of the Members of the European Parliament (MEPs), we gauged elected policy‐makers' attitudes towards the mandate and policy conduct of the European Central Bank (ECB). Our findings show that the political orientation of politicians largely drives attitudes towards the ECB's institutional mandate. Interestingly, the findings from two experiments embedded in the survey also show that the attitudes of MEPs are not as static as ideological orientations would lead us to expect. The information set to which politicians are exposed significantly shapes their views on both the ECB's mandate and its policy conduct, but less on ECB independence.

Suggested Citation

  • Federico M. Ferrara & Donato Masciandaro & Manuela Moschella & Davide Romelli, 2025. "What Do Politicians Think of Technocratic Institutions? Attitudes in the European Parliament Towards the European Central Bank," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 564-589, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:2:p:564-589
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13626
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13626?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:2:p:564-589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.