IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v63y2025i2p507-525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • David Moloney
  • Mads Dagnis Jensen

Abstract

This study revisits the salience of the Brexit negotiations using an advanced Decision‐Making in the European Union (EU) methodology to assess the relative importance of 20 key issues amongst the EU27 member states, the European Commission and the UK. Unlike earlier studies that suggest more uniform salience levels, except for the UK, our analysis identifies eight clusters of actors influenced by their political, economic and geographical contexts. These differences in salience levels have been conducive to logrolling, which likely supported a unified EU stance and a successful agreement with the UK. Additionally, our research quantitatively confirms the UK's distinct salience position, highlighting its isolation and reducing its ability to use divisive negotiation tactics. These findings offer insights into both the dynamics of past Brexit negotiations and ongoing EU–UK policy developments. They contribute to the analysis of Brexit and international negotiations in general by systematically exploring salience in high‐level diplomatic negotiations.

Suggested Citation

  • David Moloney & Mads Dagnis Jensen, 2025. "Brexit Rhapsody: Exploring Patterns of Issue Salience in the Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 507-525, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:2:p:507-525
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13624
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13624?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:63:y:2025:i:2:p:507-525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.