IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v61y2023i2p451-468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three Decades on: Still a Capability–Expectations Gap? Pragmatic Expectations towards the EU from Asia in 2020

Author

Listed:
  • Suetyi Lai
  • Paul Bacon
  • Martin Holland

Abstract

This paper uses Hill's seminal ‘Capability–Expectations Gap’ framework (CEG) to analyse EU capabilities and expectations of the EU, from the perspectives of four key Asia‐Pacific states, China, Indonesia, Japan and South Korea. Intensive analysis of domestic print media shows that all four states have low perceptions of EU capability, particularly EU ability to reach agreement on common action. Indonesia and South Korea also have low overall expectations of the EU. Japan has some expectations of the EU, but mostly related to EU internal and neighbourhood action, confirming findings of previous research identifying a Japanese ‘expectations deficit’ regarding EU external action. China however had many expectations of EU external action, on bilateral relations, but also multilateral governance and management of the international economy. Therefore, from the Chinese perspective a significant EU capability–expectations gap is identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Suetyi Lai & Paul Bacon & Martin Holland, 2023. "Three Decades on: Still a Capability–Expectations Gap? Pragmatic Expectations towards the EU from Asia in 2020," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 451-468, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:61:y:2023:i:2:p:451-468
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13382
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13382?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bokhan Ð .V., 2019. "Diplomacy Of The European Union And Eco-Branding Countries," Balanced Nature Using, Institute of agroecology and environmental management, vol. 8(2), pages 50-57, May.
    2. Christopher Hill, 2004. "Renationalizing or Regrouping? EU Foreign Policy Since 11 September 2001," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 143-163, February.
    3. Henrik Larsen, 2020. "Normative Power Europe or Capability–expectations Gap? The Performativity of Concepts in the Study of European Foreign Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 962-977, July.
    4. Suetyi Lai & Martin Holland & Serena Kelly, 2019. "The Emperor’s new clothes? Perceptions of the EU’s strategic partnerships in Asia," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 341-360, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian B. Jensen & Jonathan Slapin & Thomas König, 2007. "Who Calls for a Common EU Foreign Policy?," European Union Politics, , vol. 8(3), pages 387-410, September.
    2. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:555-578 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:531-554 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Ulf Jakobsson, 2009. "An International Actor Under Pressure: The Impact of the War on Terror and the Fifth Enlargement on EU Voting Cohesion at the UN General Assembly 2000–05," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 531-554, June.
    5. Ulrich Krotz, 2009. "Momentum and Impediments: Why Europe Won't Emerge as a Full Political Actor on the World Stage Soon," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 555-578, June.
    6. Sunghoon Park, 2019. "EU’s strategic partnership with Asian countries: an introductory article for the special issue," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 257-263, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:61:y:2023:i:2:p:451-468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.