IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v59y2021i2p297-315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The European Union's ‘Potential We’ between Acceptance and Contestation: Assessing the Positioning of Six Eastern Partnership Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Alena Vieira

Abstract

The present contribution analyses the European neighbourhood policy and the Eastern Partnership (EaP), which celebrated its tenth anniversary in 2019, from the perspective of social identity theory. It is argued that the evolution of both the European neighbourhood policy and the EaP corresponds to the emergence of a distinct EU identity: its ‘potential we’, which has been defying the Russian ‘significant we’ extended to the EaP states. Drawing on the framing analysis of strategic documents and statements, which identifies eight distinct themes, the contribution ascertains three different patterns of EaP states’ interaction with the EU: Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine accepting the ‘EU's potential we’, Armenia holding to the potential we, and Azerbaijan, as well as Belarus, contesting the potential we.

Suggested Citation

  • Alena Vieira, 2021. "The European Union's ‘Potential We’ between Acceptance and Contestation: Assessing the Positioning of Six Eastern Partnership Countries," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 297-315, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:59:y:2021:i:2:p:297-315
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13069
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.13069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giselle Bosse, 2010. "The EU's Relations with Moldova: Governance, Partnership or Ignorance?," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(8), pages 1291-1309.
    2. Jonathan Joseph & Ana E. Juncos, 2019. "Resilience as an Emergent European Project? The EU's Place in the Resilience Turn," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(5), pages 995-1011, September.
    3. Frank Mols & Martin Weber, 2013. "Laying Sound Foundations for S ocial I dentity T heory-Inspired E uropean U nion Attitude Research: Beyond Attachment and Deeply Rooted Identities," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 505-521, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Jacobs & Niels Gheyle & Ferdi De Ville & Jan Orbie, 2023. "The Hegemonic Politics of ‘Strategic Autonomy’ and ‘Resilience’: COVID‐19 and the Dislocation of EU Trade Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 3-19, January.
    2. ABABAKR Amer, 2022. "Unfreezing 'The Transnistria Conflict' From The Lens Of Regional Security Complex Theory," Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies (EEJRS), Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), vol. 8(1), pages 5-20, June.
    3. Claudia Speidel, 2024. "The impact of cultural settings on sustainability narratives: an explorative study with the Indian diaspora," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Per Becker, 2021. "Fragmentation, commodification and responsibilisation in the governing of flood risk mitigation in Sweden," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(2), pages 393-413, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:59:y:2021:i:2:p:297-315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.