IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v57y2019i2p317-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Do Farm Animal Welfare Regulations Vary Between EU Member States? A Comparative Analysis of Societal and Party Political Determinants in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Colette S. Vogeler

Abstract

In the field of agricultural policy, farm animal welfare is gaining importance. At the European Union level, animal welfare policies have been developing since the 1970s. However, national regulations vary considerably between member states. The study provides a systematic comparison of farm animal welfare regulations in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK and explores the factors that influence differences by applying theories from comparative policy analysis. Firstly, in four of the five countries the level of societal concern influences animal welfare policies. Secondly, a connection between the level of societal concern and the emphasis of political parties on farm animal welfare is identified. The findings contribute to the exploration of a hitherto under‐researched area in public policy, the field of farm animal welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Colette S. Vogeler, 2019. "Why Do Farm Animal Welfare Regulations Vary Between EU Member States? A Comparative Analysis of Societal and Party Political Determinants in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 317-335, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:57:y:2019:i:2:p:317-335
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12794
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.12794?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hopkins, Kelsey A. & McKendree, Melissa G.S. & Schaefer, K. Aleks, 2022. "Resolving the reality gap in farm regulation voting models," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Carsten Strøby Jensen, 2020. "While We Are Waiting for the Superbug: Constitutional Asymmetry and EU Governmental Policies to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1361-1376, November.
    3. Johanna Kuenzler & Colette Vogeler & Anne-Marie Parth & Titian Gohl, 2024. "Exploring the eternal struggle: The Narrative Policy Framework and status quo versus policy change," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(3), pages 485-517, September.
    4. Pejman, Niloofar & Kallas, Zein & Reig, Lourdes & Velarde, Antonio & Moreno, Maria & Magnani, Diego & Protopapadaki, Vicky & Ribikauskas, Vytautas & Ribikauskienė, Daiva & Dalmau, Antoni, 2021. "Should Animal Welfare Be Included in Educational Programs? Attitudes of Secondary and University Students from Eight EU Countries," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314969, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:57:y:2019:i:2:p:317-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.