IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v53y2015i6p1268-1284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legislative Scrutiny? The Political Economy and Practice of Legislative Vetoes in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Kaeding
  • Kevin M. Stack

Abstract

This article examines the European Parliament's and Council of Ministers' use of legislative vetoes to override the European Commission's rule-making. Well-established principles of political economy suggest that the Parliament and Council will exercise their veto powers infrequently. Using an original data set of legislative vetoes of Commission acts by both European legislators from June 2006 to April 2014, we show that levels of formal exercise of the legislative veto to overrule the Commission's regulatory policies are indeed very low. Particularly interesting is the fact that the level of exercise of legislative veto provisions has not increased significantly since the Lisbon Treaty came into effect, suggesting that the ways in which the Treaty formally augmented the powers of legislative scrutiny have not resulted in appreciably greater formal exercise of these powers. Moreover, no significant differences appear between the two European Union legislative bodies.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Kaeding & Kevin M. Stack, 2015. "Legislative Scrutiny? The Political Economy and Practice of Legislative Vetoes in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(6), pages 1268-1284, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:53:y:2015:i:6:p:1268-1284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/jcms.12252
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Beyers & Guido Dierickx, 1998. "The Working Groups of the Council of the European Union: Supranational or Intergovernmental Negotiations?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 289-317, September.
    2. Christiansen, Thomas & Dobbels, Mathias, 2012. "Comitology and delegated acts after Lisbon: How the European Parliament lost the implementation game," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katrijn Siderius & Gijs Jan Brandsma, 2016. "The Effect of Removing Voting Rules: Consultation Practices in the Commission's Delegated Act Expert Groups and Comitology Committees," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 1265-1279, November.
    2. Jens Blom-Hansen, 2019. "Studying power and influence in the European Union: Exploiting the complexity of post-Lisbon legislation with EUR-Lex," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(4), pages 692-706, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roland Vaubel, 2008. "The political economy of labor market regulation by the European Union," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 435-465, December.
    2. Semin Suvarierol, 2009. "Networking in Brussels: Nationality over a Glass of Wine," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 411-435, March.
    3. Jolyon Howorth, 2011. "Decision-Making in Security and Defence Policy - Towards Supranational Intergovernmentalism?," KFG Working Papers p0025, Free University Berlin.
    4. Roland Vaubel, 2004. "Federation With Majority Decisions: Economic Lessons From The History Of The Unite D States, Germany And The European Union," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 53-59, December.
    5. Arjan Uilenreef, 2016. "‘Multiple Bilateralism’ within the European Union: the Dutch Coalition-Building Network during the Budget Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 426-443, March.
    6. Frans Stokman & Robert Thomson, 2004. "Winners and Losers in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 5(1), pages 5-23, March.
    7. Daniel Polman & Gerry Alons, 2021. "Reap what you sow: implementing agencies as strategic actors in policy feedback dynamics," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(4), pages 823-848, December.
    8. Frank M. Häge, 2007. "Committee Decision-making in the Council of the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 8(3), pages 299-328, September.
    9. Smeets, Sandrino, 2013. "How issues move or get stuck: Or how to be effective in the EU Council of Ministers," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 17, July.
    10. Daniel Naurin, 2007. "Network Capital and Cooperation Patterns in the Working Groups of the Council of the EU," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 14, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    11. Field, Mark, 2013. "The anatomy of EU policy-making: Appointing the experts," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 17, July.
    12. Bernhard Boockmann & Roland Vaubel, 2009. "The Theory of Raising Rivals’ Costs and Evidence from the International Labour Organisation," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 862-887, June.
    13. Stefanie Bailer, 2004. "Bargaining Success in the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 5(1), pages 99-123, March.
    14. Christina Zimmer & Gerald Schneider & Michael Dobbins, 2005. "The Contested Council: Conflict Dimensions of an Intergovernmental EU Institution," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 53(2), pages 403-422, June.
    15. Markus Johansson, 2021. "Explaining Cooperation in the Council of the EU Before and After the Brexit Referendum," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 5-15.
    16. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:411-435 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Yoo, Boonghee, 2009. "Developing an overall ranking of 79 marketing journals: An introduction of PRINQUAL to marketing," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 160-174.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:53:y:2015:i:6:p:1268-1284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.