IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v46y2008i4p765-786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Legitimate is the Open Method of Co‐ordination?

Author

Listed:
  • MILENA BÜCHS

Abstract

This article argues that the OMC's legitimacy can be improved only by strengthening parliamentary channels of input‐legitimacy since output‐legitimacy alone is inappropriate and cannot be achieved without input‐legitimacy. In addition, concepts and practices of direct ‘stakeholder’ participation currently applied within the OMC are insufficient in strengthening input‐legitimacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Milena Büchs, 2008. "How Legitimate is the Open Method of Co‐ordination?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 765-786, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:46:y:2008:i:4:p:765-786
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00804.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00804.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00804.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rik de Ruiter, 2013. "Full disclosure? The Open Method of Coordination, parliamentary debates and media coverage," European Union Politics, , vol. 14(1), pages 95-114, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:46:y:2008:i:4:p:765-786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.