IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v45y2007i3p565-587.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EU Annual Budgetary Procedure: The Existing Rules and Proposed Reforms of the Convention and Intergovernmental Conference 2002–04

Author

Listed:
  • GIACOMO BENEDETTO
  • BJORN HOYLAND

Abstract

This article analyses the proposed reform of the annual budgetary procedure of the European Union (EU) during the 2002–04 Convention and Intergovernmental Conference (IGC). We offer two findings. First, the European Parliament already has the power to reduce agricultural and fisheries spending subject to support from a blocking minority in the Council. Hence, a reduction of the Union's spending on agriculture and other areas of compulsory expenditure is not dependent on a reform of the budgetary procedure. Second, the proposal from the Convention would have increased EP budgetary powers while the procedure adopted by the IGC strengthens the hand of the Council, removing Parliament's right to overrule it. In constitutional bargaining, we see that Parliament gains in a deliberative forum where unanimity is not required, while it loses in a closed IGC.

Suggested Citation

  • Giacomo Benedetto & Bjorn Hoyland, 2007. "The EU Annual Budgetary Procedure: The Existing Rules and Proposed Reforms of the Convention and Intergovernmental Conference 2002–04," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 565-587, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:45:y:2007:i:3:p:565-587
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00727.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00727.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00727.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valerio Leone Sciabolazza, 2022. "Bargaining within the Council of the European Union: An Empirical Study on the Allocation of Funds of the European Budget," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 8(2), pages 227-258, July.
    2. Christophe Crombez & Bjoern Høyland, 2015. "The budgetary procedure in the European Union and the implications of the Treaty of Lisbon," European Union Politics, , vol. 16(1), pages 67-89, March.
    3. Giacomo Benedetto, 2017. "Institutions and the route to reform of the European Union’s budget revenue, 1970–2017," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 44(4), pages 615-633, November.
    4. Paolo Pasimeni & Stéphanie Riso, 2019. "Redistribution and stabilisation through the EU budget," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 36(1), pages 111-138, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:45:y:2007:i:3:p:565-587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.