IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v44y2006i3p625-643.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intelligence‐Sharing in the European Union: Institutions Are Not Enough

Author

Listed:
  • JAMES I. WALSH

Abstract

The European Union (EU) has developed three institutions to facilitate intelligence‐sharing between its Member States: the Berne Group, Europol and the European Union Military Staff. These institutions serve the useful function of creating technical mechanisms for the diffusion of intelligence among national authorities. But they do not tackle the problem of mistrust, which is the key barrier to fully effective intelligence‐sharing. This article shows that mistrust of the interests of other Member States inhibits intelligence‐sharing, that existing institutions fail to overcome this mistrust and suggests changes that could lead to more effective sharing.

Suggested Citation

  • James I. Walsh, 2006. "Intelligence‐Sharing in the European Union: Institutions Are Not Enough," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 625-643, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:44:y:2006:i:3:p:625-643
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00638.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00638.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00638.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:1351-1365 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Thomas Jensen, 2012. "National Responses to Transnational Terrorism: Intelligence and Counterterrorism Provision," Discussion Papers 12-22, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    3. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:46:y:2008:i::p:49-73 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Raphael Bossong, 2011. "Public Good Theory and the 'Added Value' of the EU's Counterterrorism Policy," Economics of Security Working Paper Series 42, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    5. Per M. Norheim‐Martinsen, 2010. "Beyond Intergovernmentalism: European Security and Defence Policy and the Governance Approach," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(5), pages 1351-1365, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:44:y:2006:i:3:p:625-643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.