IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v42y2004i3p619-639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Europeanization, Conditionality and Domestic Change: The Twinning Exercise and Administrative Reform in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitris Papadimitriou
  • David Phinnemore

Abstract

A key requirement of the countries of central and eastern Europe (CEECs) that wish to join the EU is that they develop the administrative capacity to implement effectively the acquis communautaire. The ‘twinning’ programme is designed to assist in this process. Drawing on experiences in Romania, and linking these to debates on Europeanization, this article argues that the success of twinning to date is related to the design of the programme, institutional fluidity and politicization within central administration, the individual agency and the reform commitment of those hosting twinning projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitris Papadimitriou & David Phinnemore, 2004. "Europeanization, Conditionality and Domestic Change: The Twinning Exercise and Administrative Reform in Romania," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 619-639, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:42:y:2004:i:3:p:619-639
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00521.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00521.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00521.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eva G. Heidbreder, 2009. "Structuring the European Administrative Space - Channels of EU Penetration and Mechanisms ofNational Change," KFG Working Papers p0005, Free University Berlin.
    2. Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling & Will Lowe & Christian van Stolk, 2016. "Silent professionalization: EU integration and the professional socialization of public officials in Central and Eastern Europe," European Union Politics, , vol. 17(1), pages 162-183, March.
    3. Rem, D. & Gasper, D.R., 2008. "Romania's accession process into the European Union: discourses at policy-, program-, and project-levels in the justice sector," ISS Working Papers - General Series 18730, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    4. Madalina-Stefania Dirzu, 2011. "The Europeanization Of Central And Eastern Europe," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 3(1), pages 49-54, March.
    5. Teodor Lucian Moga & Diana Onu, 2011. "The Europeanisation Process And The Pre-Accession Dynamics In Romania," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 3(1), pages 64-71, March.
    6. Cipolletta, Germano & Fiorani, Gloria & Matei, Ani & Matei, Lucica & Meneguzzo, Marco & Mititelu, Cristina, 2010. "Public Sector Modernization Trends of the Member States of European Union.Trajectories of reforms in Italy and Romania," Apas Papers 267, Academic Public Administration Studies Archive - APAS.
    7. Roșca Vlad I., 2017. "The Europeanisation of Romanian football: What do UEFA country coefficients reveal?," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(4), pages 652-673, December.
    8. Dimitris Papadimitriou & Eli Gateva, 2009. "Between Enlargement-led Europeanisation and Balkan Exceptionalism: an appraisal of Bulgaria’s and Romania’s entry into the European Union," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 25, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    9. Adam Fagan & Indraneel Sircar, 2020. "Transformation All the Way Down? European Union Integration and the Professional Socialization of Municipal Health Officials in Serbia," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 688-705, May.
    10. Ana BADIU, 2013. "European Funds for Agriculture and Rural Development – Help or Burden for Romania?," Europolity – Continuity and Change in European Governance - New Series, Department of International Relations and European Integration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 7(1), pages 73-86.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:42:y:2004:i:3:p:619-639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.